{"id":3551,"date":"2021-03-17T00:47:43","date_gmt":"2021-03-17T00:47:43","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/darachi.com\/?p=3551"},"modified":"2021-03-18T08:29:12","modified_gmt":"2021-03-18T08:29:12","slug":"nick-buxton-great-reset-global-coup-detat","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/darachi.com\/nick-buxton-great-reset-global-coup-detat\/","title":{"rendered":"Global Coup d\u2019\u00c9tat: Mapping the Corporate Takeover of Global Governance"},"content":{"rendered":"
\"Nick<\/a><\/h6>\n

Watch \u27a5\u00a0 LBRY<\/a>\u00a0 |\u00a0 Rumble<\/a>\u00a0 |\u00a0 Brighteon<\/a>\u00a0 |\u00a0 Minds<\/a>\u00a0 |\u00a0 Archive<\/a><\/p>\n

Background<\/h2>\n

Decisions that deeply affect our lives are being made by secretive unaccountable bodies run by corporations. Decisions historically made by governments. This powershift is accelerating, and threatening democracy.<\/p>\n

In this interview, Nick Buxton, publications editor and future labs coordinator for Transnational Institute (TNI), outlines the global and systemic trend towards corporate capture of global governance.<\/p>\n

TNI has remarked:<\/p>\n

The World Economic Forum has developed and pushed for the privatization of global governance for decades. The ‘Great Reset’ is just the latest iteration of the gradual corporate takeover of global institutions, such as the UN and other international bodies, that take critical decisions over the governance of global common goods like food, water, health, internet and others.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The WEF\u2019s \u2018Great Reset\u2019 should more accurately be called the \u2018Great Take Over\u2019.<\/p>\n

Transnational corporations in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic have been seeking to cement their control of global governance, ensuring it serves the interests of business and profits rather than the well-being of humanity.<\/p>\n

Big tech, for example, many of them WEF partners<\/a> (Amazon Web Services, Facebook, Twitter, Google, LinkedIn, to name a few), have been greatly profiting from the coronavirus restrictions whilst simultaneously shadowbanning, deplatforming, demonetizing, and removing lawful user content that has been deemed by them, through non-transparent processes, to contradict unelected “global health authorities”.<\/p>\n

Big tech companies allege that users who contradict “global health authorities” risk the “safety” of their users. For example LinkedIn felt the need to “protect” its users from a scientific paper by Professor Lauc, that postulated indoor humidity levels may have a role<\/a> in COVID-19 severity risk, even though his paper had been accepted<\/a> (those with an interest in the role of humidity, please see https:\/\/40to60rh.com<\/a>).<\/p>\n

Although I appealed, LinkedIn wrote back that I’d lost the appeal. They did not provide any counter-evidence or any reasoning, not even upon repeated requests. In fact, LinkedIn deplatformed me for “spreading false information” and cited that I’d posted Professor Lauc’s paper. Their termination email said that I could appeal. I wrote back that I would indeed appeal as I had never knowingly, let alone intentionally spread false information, and asked a couple of questions to help me frame my appeal.<\/p>\n

Although I explicitly stated my reply was not an appeal (in order to be abundantly cautious that they would treat it as an appeal), I received an email back to say that I’d lost my appeal! I wrote back asking how I could lose an appeal that I never made, only to get a reply to say sorry that the decision is final.<\/p>\n

To add to alarm. Although in the past few months, countries with a recent memory of communism, namely Hungary and Poland have started to draft laws to protect their democracy (e.g. making it illegal to censor lawful user content, i.e. protect free speech) from big tech, the United Nations is proposing to set up a digital governance body<\/a>. It will mostly be dominated by Big Tech representatives so that we have a global big tech-led body for governance of big tech. Email and a self-hosted blog may be my last refuge.<\/p>\n

There’s a lot of interlocking pieces to understand the chaotic “shit show” we’ve experienced for a year now. In addition to this interview, may I suggest also:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. What is Schwab\u2019s \u201cPost Corona Era\u201d Great Reset? A Global Marxist Totalitarian Technocracy?<\/a><\/li>\n
  2. The Great Reset is Communism 3.0 \u2014 Martin Armstrong<\/a><\/li>\n
  3. Blockchain Powered Financial Reset, & the \u201cHealthcare Crisis\u201d Robert F Kennedy Jr , Catherine Fitts<\/a><\/li>\n
  4. Apocalypse 2020: Draconian Censorship, Non-Scientific Lockdowns, Media Deception, Rise of Technocracy \u2014 Jay W. Richards<\/a><\/li>\n
  5. Anniversary of Yet Another \u201cPandemic\u201d (March 2020-2021)<\/a><\/li>\n
  6. Public is Being \u201cLed to Their Downfall\u201d With False Coronavirus Narrative \u2014 Sucharit Bhakdi MD<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    For those interested in more information specifically relating to the interview, these PDF slides may help:<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. Where we are now with the global governance of TNCS<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. Where we are now with the emergence of multistakeholderism<\/a><\/li>\n
    3. Global governance without TNCs: a conversation starter<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. Mapping Global Multistakeholder Institutions (MSIs): Key features & preliminary results<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      It should be clear that the WEF is seeking to exploit the mostly manufactured crisis to entrench a governance model that favours the interests of transnational corporations. The UN has opened up its doors to the World Economic Forum, by signing a strategic partnership agreement with WEF that allows unprecedented access to the UN system.<\/p>\n

      It’s not a Great Reset that is needed. It’s a ‘Democratic Reset’.<\/p>\n