{"id":3541,"date":"2021-03-19T22:59:32","date_gmt":"2021-03-19T22:59:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/darachi.com\/?p=3541"},"modified":"2021-03-19T22:59:32","modified_gmt":"2021-03-19T22:59:32","slug":"vanden-bossche-theory-fact-or-fiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/darachi.com\/vanden-bossche-theory-fact-or-fiction\/","title":{"rendered":"Vanden Bossche’s Theory: Mass Vaccination Will Breed Dangerous Variants \u2013 Fact or Fiction?"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
The two posts<\/a> I made regarding Vanden Bossche’s theory which claims mass vaccination is “transforming a quite harmless virus<\/a> into an uncontrollable monster” attracted a lot of interest. Naturally people were then eager to know if it had truth.<\/p>\n I considered it having some degree of credibility, else I’d not have published it. However my cause is five-fold:<\/p>\n Struggle to maintain the power or right to express one\u2019s opinions without censorship, restraint, or legal penalty. Second, the protection of sufficiently broad public discourse. Third, the protection of scientific discovery, a process which requires the free exchange of ideas. Fourth, provision of counterbalance to propaganda, namely biased or misleading information provided by mainstream media, typically in support of a political cause or point of view. Fifth, an extra voice for the more vulnerable in society; children, elderly, the sick and the poor.<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Once something seems to have a degree of credibility and it’s censored by big tech (or looks likely to be censored), I add it to a list for consideration of publication.<\/p>\n Because of the interest expressed, I decided to have a first-round of validity scoring. I pinged three top-scientists, namely:<\/p>\n And asked their thoughts in a few email exchanges.<\/p>\n I’ve posted their raw unedited emails below, along with the biography of each.<\/p>\n If there’s more interest, I’ll go to a round-two of validity scoring, taking into account the input below.<\/p>\n\n